<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/">

	<channel>
	  <!-- main channel info -->
        <title>HOW SHOULD FRANCHISORS TREAT EX-FRANCHISEES IN ORDER NOT TO GET “RUBBISHED”? </title>
        <link>http://franchiseesforum.com/topic/394/t/--FRANCHISORS-TREAT-EX-FRANCHISEES--ORDER----RUBBISHED-.html</link>
        <description>
        <![CDATA[ I recently went to a seminar on this subject. It was attended by numerous well-known franchisors, as well as representatives of Solicitors, franchise
consultants, academics and others from well known organisations.


It is well recognised by franchisors, that having an unhappy ex-franchisee is bad for business. No. Really?


The seminar discussed the basic philosophy about &quot;looking after&quot; departing franchisees by conducting exit interviews etc. All great stuff.


It also discussed... ]]>
        </description>

		<!-- optional elements -->
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2006, Kickapps</copyright>
		<managingEditor>feeds@kickapps.com (FeedMaster)</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>webmaster@kickapps.com (WebMaster)</webMaster>
		<!-- note: dates need to be RFC 822 formated "Sat, 07 Sep 2002 00:00:01 GMT" -->
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 15:22:36 GMT</pubDate>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 May 2010 15:38:47 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>Kickapps Feeds 1.0</generator>
		<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
		<!-- <cloud domain="rpc.kickapps.com" port="80" path="/RPC2" registerProcedure="pingMe" protocol="soap"/>-->
		<ttl>60</ttl>

		<rating>
		{pics-1.1 &quot;http://www.icra.org/ratingsv02.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://kickapps.com&quot; r (nz 1 vz 1 lz 1 oz 1 cz 1 ) &quot;http://www.rsac.org/ratingsv01.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://kickapps.com&quot; r (n 0 s 0 v 0 l 0 ))
		</rating>
		<textInput>
			<title>Search</title>
			<description>Search Domain</description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://kickapps.com/search/direct/</link>
		</textInput>
		<!-- skip
		<skipHours>
			<hour>23</hour>
		</skipHours>
		<skipDays>
			<day>Monday</day>
			<day>Wednesday</day>
			<day>Friday</day>
		</skipDays>-->
		<!-- extensions -->


		<!-- channel items -->
		<!-- descriptions should be shorter than 500 char to be polite -->
		<!-- html shoud be stripped or escaped -->
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: HOW SHOULD FRANCHISORS TREAT EX-FRANCHISEES IN ORDER NOT TO GET “RUBBISHED”?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://franchiseesforum.com/reply/6/t/--FRANCHISORS-TREAT-EX-FRANCHISEES--ORDER----RUBBISHED-.html#reply-6</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ This is indeed a very helpful information. Thanks for sharing Micmarcmm. <br>
I'm a newbie here and i find most of the posting interesting where i started to like it here. :) ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@kickapps.com (stevanz)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://franchiseesforum.com/sreply/6</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 31 May 2010 15:38:47 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: HOW SHOULD FRANCHISORS TREAT EX-FRANCHISEES IN ORDER NOT TO GET “RUBBISHED”?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://franchiseesforum.com/reply/5/t/--FRANCHISORS-TREAT-EX-FRANCHISEES--ORDER----RUBBISHED-.html#reply-5</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ This is fantastic. Complete disclosure about franchisees in the group currently, and then after they leave. It places even more importance of the franchisor to
maintain proper relationships with the people in the network and treat them right, not as a number. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@kickapps.com (newcastlefranchisee)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://franchiseesforum.com/sreply/5</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 18:56:54 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ HOW SHOULD FRANCHISORS TREAT EX-FRANCHISEES IN ORDER NOT TO GET “RUBBISHED”?  ]]></title>
			<link>http://franchiseesforum.com/topic/394/t/--FRANCHISORS-TREAT-EX-FRANCHISEES--ORDER----RUBBISHED-.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I recently went to a seminar on this subject. It was attended by numerous well-known franchisors, as well as representatives of Solicitors, franchise
consultants, academics and others from well known organisations.
<br>
<br>
It is well recognised by franchisors, that having an unhappy ex-franchisee is bad for business. No. Really?
<br>
<br>
The seminar discussed the basic philosophy about &quot;looking after&quot; departing franchisees by conducting exit interviews etc. All great stuff.
<br>
<br>
It also discussed the &quot;defensive&quot; actions that franchisors should take - actions that do NOTHING to deal with the root cause of the problem, and that
simply address the symptoms. (Example: Include clauses in the Agreement to stop franchisees using the franchise name in a website address that may be used to
&quot;rubbish&quot; the franchise - www.XFranchiseSucks.com.au ).
<br>
<br>
The new Disclosure rules also make it mandatory for franchisors to list franchisees who have left the... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@kickapps.com (Micmarcmm)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://franchiseesforum.com/topic/394</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 15:22:36 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
    <!-- end items -->

  </channel>
</rss>